Blog Details

Unmasking Dark Patterns

Have you ever tried to cancel a digital subscription, only to find yourself lost in a maze of confusing clicks? Or perhaps you noticed an extra, unwanted item magically appear in your cart right before checkout? You aren’t losing your mind, and you aren’t just bad at navigating the web. You are experiencing a psychological trap known as a “dark pattern.”

In a landmark move, the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) levied a ₹5 lakh fine against PhysicsWallah and ₹1 lakh against McAfee Software for deceptive designs. PhysicsWallah was penalized for “basket sneaking” a pre-selected ₹10 donation at checkout, using “confirm shaming” to retain it, and illegally harvesting data by forcing users to surrender details for “free” courses. Meanwhile, McAfee was fined for fear-based subscription renewals, making users choose between “Renew Now” and “Accept Risk,” falsely equating non-renewal with a security threat.

Legal Framework against Dark Patterns.

Key regulations against dark patterns relies on the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (classifying them as unfair trade practices), the specific CCPA Guidelines, 2023 (banning 13 distinct tactics), E-Commerce Rules, 2020 (mandating affirmative consent), and the DPDP Act, 2023 (prohibiting deceptive personal data harvesting).

Some of the critical Dark Patterns include;

  • Basket Sneaking: Secretly adding unrequested items or donations to a shopping cart before checkout.
  • Confirm Shaming: Using guilt or emotionally loaded language to manipulate a user’s choice.
  • Subscription Trap: Making a recurring service effortless to join but deliberately complex to cancel.
  • Drip Pricing: Concealing mandatory fees and convenience charges until the final checkout stage.
  • Interface Interference: Manipulating visual design elements to highlight the company’s preferred option while obscuring alternatives.

As regulations tighten, aligning user interfaces with the law has evolved into a key focus: digital compliance. By auditing digital designs, businesses achieve dual harmonization—ensuring their platforms simultaneously satisfy consumer protection laws and data privacy statutes like the DPDP Act. Aligning these legal boundaries with user experience design shields companies from heavy penalties while protecting brand reputation, turning ethical architecture into a powerful asset for sustainable growth.

Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are solely for legal research purposes and do not constitute legal opinion, legal advice, solicitation, or professional guidance of any nature. The views are personal to the author and do not necessarily reflect those of PJ Law Offices (www.pjlaw.in), its principal, representatives, associates, retainers, affiliates (collectively, “PJLaw”). Readers are advised to seek independent legal counsel before acting on any information contained herein. PJLaw makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or completeness of the contents and expressly disclaims all liability arising from reliance upon or use of the same.

Related blogs

shape